Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Automatic Exploit Generation (AEG) plays an important role in proactive assessment of software threats by identifying vulnerabilities and constructing functional payloads. Existing Large Language Model (LLM)-based methods, however, often struggle to reason about complex exploit logic and to perform runtime introspection, leaving a gap between static vulnerability analysis and dynamic memory behavior. We present PwnAgent, an LLM-driven multi-agent framework for end-to-end exploit generation that combines offensive domain knowledge with active runtime introspection. PwnAgent uses a hierarchical knowledge base for multi-stage exploit reasoning and a feedback-driven self-correction engine to calibrate dynamic memory parameters during execution. Because broad Capture The Flag (CTF) benchmarks offer limited binary-exploitation depth and pwn-specific evaluation must balance reproducibility, difficulty progression, and exploit diversity, we construct a 66-task pwn benchmark from public CTF-style challenges. The benchmark is primarily composed of Linux x86/x86-64 ELF binaries and stack-oriented tasks, with smaller format-string, heap, integer-overflow, ARM, and MIPS subsets used as limited probes beyond the dominant setting. Under the same recent Kimi-K2.6 backend, PwnAgent achieves a 62.12% end-to-end success rate, compared with 31.82% for the evaluated PwnGPT baseline, a 30.30 percentage-point gain. These paired results indicate that structured knowledge guidance, execution-grounded measurement, and feedback repair improve LLM-based exploit generation in the evaluated setting, while the absolute success rate shows that fully autonomous exploitation remains challenging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: