Chicken skin and related poultry by-products are rich in collagen and lipids but remain underutilized, creating opportunities for their conversion into value-added functional ingredients. This study developed chicken-skin-based protein–fat emulsions and evaluated the effect of changing the fat-to-hydrolysate ratio on their physicochemical, techno-functional, compositional, rheological, oxidative, and microbiological properties. Four formulations containing 13.5–15.0% chicken fat and 6.8–5.3% chicken skin protein hydrolysate were prepared, while chicken skin and water were maintained at 36.4 and 43.3%, respectively. Three independent production batches were prepared for each formulation. The emulsions showed similar pH (4.82–4.99) and water activity (0.979–0.996) (p > 0.05). Water-holding capacity decreased from 78.74% to 73.60%, whereas fat-holding capacity increased from 41.00% to 62.40% (p < 0.05). Variant 3 showed the highest emulsion stability (22%) and an emulsifying capacity of 56%, while Variant 4 had the highest apparent viscosity (577 mPa·s) but the lowest yield stress (2.011 Pa). The emulsions exhibited a collagen-rich amino acid profile, and oleic, palmitic, and linoleic acids predominated in the lipid fraction. During refrigerated storage, TBARS increased from 0.34–0.37 to 2.19–2.51 mg MDA/kg, while total viable counts reached 3.83–4.03 log CFU/g by day 14. Among the tested formulations, Variant 3 showed a favorable combination of stability and emulsifying and rheological properties. These results identify chicken-skin-based protein–fat emulsions as candidate functional ingredients for further evaluation in food formulations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okuskhanova et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: