Context Fertilization of tropical pastures in Latin America is limited and predominantly based on urea as the sole nitrogen (N) source. This contrasts with the widespread multi-nutrient limitations of highly weathered soils, which may restrict the effectiveness of N-only fertilization. However, field-scale evaluations of alternative fertilization strategies under grazing conditions remain limited. Methods We evaluated fertilization strategies combining additional nutrients and seasonally adapted N sources (hereafter referred to as Opt treatments) for their effects on forage production and cattle productivity under grazing conditions, compared with conventional urea fertilization in Urochloa humidicola pastures. A replicated field experiment was conducted in the Eastern Plains of Colombia, comparing two doses of the Opt fertilization strategy (Opt-100 and Opt-75) with equivalent urea-based treatments and an unfertilized control. A modified treatment excluding potassium (K) and partially reducing phosphorus (P) inputs (Opt-Nutrients) was also included. In addition, a complementary miniplot experiment was conducted to assess short-term nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions. Results The Opt-100 treatment achieved a daily cattle weight gain of 4.81 kg live weight ha⁻¹ day⁻¹, nearly doubling the control and exceeding the Urea-100 treatment by 40%. Because stocking rates were adjusted according to the expected productivity level of each treatment, these differences reflect the performance of integrated fertilization-management strategies under grazing conditions rather than the isolated effect of fertilization alone. Daily weight gain reached 1.19 kg animal⁻¹ day⁻¹ in Opt-100 compared with 0.88 kg animal⁻¹ day⁻¹ in the control, and animals reached the target weight one rotation earlier (196 vs 224 days). This response is consistent with alleviation of nutrient co-limitations, as Opt-Nutrients and Urea-100 showed similar gains, indicating that nutrient balance rather than N source drove the response. Increasing fertilization rates resulted in greater productivity gains in the Opt than in the urea-based treatments. Forage biomass accumulation was also higher under Opt fertilization compared with the unfertilized control, although differences were partly moderated by higher stocking rates. Opt-100 and Opt-Nutrients treatments did not consistently increase short-term N₂O emissions relative to the control under the experimental conditions. Conclusions and implications These results provide field-based evidence that addressing nutrient co-limitations, rather than increasing N inputs alone, is critical to improving the productivity of tropical grazing systems. Balanced fertilization, combined with appropriate stocking-rate management, represents a practical strategy for pasture intensification under grazing conditions, with potential environmental benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vázquez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: