This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This paper presents a technical validation with clinical datasets of the Sensor Displacement Detection (SDD) framework for BabyFM, a wearable medical device for continuous axillary temperature monitoring, designed primarily for pediatric and immunocompromised patients; the clinical trial was conducted in adult patients. The study uses two distinct clinical datasets: a 15-patient feasibility cohort (14 analyzed, 7201 valid sensor readings, 97.6 h) used for post-hoc verification of the predefined SDD thresholds, and a 22-patient validation cohort (184,361 sensor readings over 500.05 cumulative hours) used to evaluate the SDD algorithm. The SDD algorithm applies a composite rule—temperature below 35.5 ∘ C combined with a rate of temperature change exceeding |dT/dt| > 1.2 ∘ C/min—to flag displacement artifacts. Across the 22-patient cohort, 2110 displacement triggers were detected, corresponding to a weighted SDD trigger rate of 1.14% (unweighted per-patient mean 1.12%, range 0.00−4.75%), consistent with the prior theoretical displacement-rate prediction of 1.4%; 98.86% of readings remained valid. Consecutive triggers were clustered into 397 discrete displacement episodes (2-min gap) or 236 clinically relevant episodes (5-min gap). The predefined thresholds were independently verified in the 15-patient feasibility cohort (136 triggers; weighted rate 1.87%; range 0.00−4.09%). Sensor accuracy was independently established in the BABYFM-010 trial (658 paired measurements against a gallium-in-glass reference: mean difference −0.09 ∘ C; 80.5% within ± 0.5 ∘ C; Pearson r = 0.830). The contribution lies in the parameterization and clinical evaluation of a rate-and-temperature artifact-rejection strategy for continuous axillary thermometry rather than in the threshold rule itself. The main limitations are the single-center, single-arm design without a randomized control group, and the adult-only cohort, which call for independent multi-center validation and dedicated studies in the intended pediatric and immunocompromised populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Papić et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: