We derive a pointwise relation between local compactness and density contrast for regular, static, spherically symmetric isotropic perfect-fluid solutions of the Einstein equations. In geometrized units, suppose that the fluid is barotropic and satisfies 0 < dp/d(epsilon) <= v_max. Then epsilon(r)[1 - 2m(r)/r]^(-1/(4v_max)) is strictly decreasing away from the regular center. Consequently, 2m(r)/r < 1 - [epsilon(r)/epsilon_c]^(4v_max), for 0 < r < R. Under the causal barotropic sound-speed condition 0 < dp/d(epsilon) <= 1, this gives 2m(r)/r < 1 - [epsilon(r)/epsilon_c]^4. If a finite stellar surface has nonzero limiting density epsilon_s, the same comparison yields 2M/R <= 1 - [epsilon_s/epsilon_c]^(4v_max). We further show that 1/(4v_max) is the largest exponent whose monotonicity can be guaranteed from the stated assumptions within the comparison family epsilon(r)[1 - 2m(r)/r]^(-a). For every larger exponent, regular near-center solutions of self-bound linear equations of state can be chosen for which the corresponding comparison function increases. The result is an interior density-contrast estimate and is not an optimal global compactness bound. Version 2 note: This revision clarifies the stated assumptions in the abstract and surface corollary, and makes the treatment of v_max consistent throughout by identifying it as a finite uniform upper bound on dp/d(epsilon), with equality to the supremum when it is chosen as the least uniform upper bound for the solution. It also improves the wording of the surface-limit argument and the physical-units discussion for clarity. The main theorem, proof, causal specialization, surface bound, and sharpness result are unchanged.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Enzo Cabrera Iglesias (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: