Substitution boxes are fundamental nonlinear components of symmetric-key ciphers, and dynamic S-box generation provides a means of diversifying the nonlinear layer during operation. However, many existing approaches focus on constructing or optimizing individual S-boxes and do not provide a systematic mechanism for preserving principal cryptographic characteristics across an entire generated family. To address this limitation, this study introduces a structured dynamic S-box construction based on Rotationally Nonsingular Binary Matrix Families (RNBMFs). A 64-bit binary seed is cyclically rotated to generate 64 interrelated 8× 8 binary matrices, which are used as reproducible affine layers around multiplicative inversion over GF(2⁸) . The admissibility condition of the complete matrix family is reduced exactly from 64 determinant checks to eight representative tests through the determinant-equivalence structure induced by cyclic row permutations. Large-scale evaluation of 10,000 distinct generated S-boxes confirms stable nonlinearity of $$112$$ , linear approximation probability of $$0.0625$$ , differential uniformity of $$4$$ , algebraic degree of $$7$$ , and boomerang uniformity of $$6$$ , while SAC behavior, fixed-point patterns, and permutation-cycle structures remain instance-dependent and can therefore be used as additional screening criteria. As an integration-level assessment, the generated S-boxes were also evaluated in a common reversible RGB permutation–diffusion configuration, producing ciphertext entropy close to $$8$$ , near-zero adjacent-pixel correlation, NPCR and UACI values close to their theoretical references, and exact image recovery. These results show that the proposed RNBMF framework provides a compact and reproducible mechanism for affine diversification of inversion-based S-boxes while preserving their principal affine-invariant cryptographic profile and enabling structurally preferable representatives to be selected for dynamic substitution layers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mukhamadiyev et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: