We argue that the possibility of induction is grounded in determinate objecthood. Identity, non-collapse, determinacy, and rendering make objects capable of determinate relation; determinate relations are themselves objects; reason actualizes this potential by positing generative structures. Induction states the exhaustiveness of such a posit and so holds wherever a start and a generating relation determine a structure: numbers, strings, trees, iterations. The argument answers Poincaré's charge of circularity and shows how a homogeneous series, arbitrarily divided, yields the order structures of the natural numbers and integers. It explains why the objects and relations that formal theories presuppose are available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Albert Peter Pacelli (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: