CODA-MUR: Certified Representation Transport, Composition, and Irreversible Forgetting A Commuting Square Is Not Target Standing: Certified Representation Transport and Irreversible Forgetting In machine learning, compilation, and abstract interpretation, representations are constantly compressed, projected, or quantized: High-dimensional vectors are mapped into lower-dimensional embeddings. Infinite integers are collapsed into parity bits (n mod 2). Verified high-level source code is compiled into optimized binary. When an observation commutes across a move, (q(F(x)) = F̄(p(x))), it is easy to mistake that compatibility for an operational license. It is not. A commuting square is a transport certificate, not target standing. CODA-MUR formalizes the algebra of moving pictures across observation boundaries while enforcing strict claim hygiene: Look After Move vs. Move After Look: A transport certificate χ_F asserts that observing after a transformation yields the same result as transforming the observation. Transports paste associatively: chaining certified moves yields a certified composite move. Collisions Travel: If two states appear identical under observation (p(x) = p(y)), they remain identical after transport. Downstream Processing Cannot Split a Collision: No downstream function or post-processing filter can un-collide states once their distinctions have been merged. Irreversible Forgetting: Non-injective collapse cannot be inverted. Once two distinct values map to a single point, no left inverse recovering every source value exists. The Authority Firewall: Compatibility with a target regime’s observation space does not grant authority within that regime. Operational standing requires reaching a declared target terminal and independently satisfying seven evidence-derived halt guards. Mechanized with zero unproved axioms (0 sorry, 0 admit) in Lean 4 and paired with an exact rational Python verification engine (featuring a closed 5 x 5 morphism composition monoid and strict loss ledgers), CODA-MUR provides the formal foundation for moving data without laundering unauthorized claims.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeremy H. Carroll (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: