Background: Rational antibiotic use is essential in maternity care because inappropriate prescribing may contribute to antimicrobial resistance. This study assessed antibiotic prescribing practices, self-reported knowledge, and training needs among obstetrician-gynecologists. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive survey was conducted among 60 obstetrician-gynecologists working in two tertiary-level maternity facilities in Almaty, Kazakhstan, from June to August 2026. Data were collected using an anonymous structured questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and Fisher’s exact tests. Results: Most respondents reported always following clinical protocols (86.7%) and using antibiotic susceptibility results to guide antibiotic selection (63.3%). Cephalosporins were the predominant antibiotic group (93.3%). Microbiological testing was reported as always or frequently performed by 73.3% of respondents, while empirical therapy was reported as always or frequently used by 53.3%. Cesarean delivery was the main reported indication for prophylaxis (60.0%), and 90.0% reported using a single prophylactic dose. Only 40.0% had received antibiotic-related training during the previous three years, while all respondents reported a need for additional training. Recent training was significantly associated with higher self-rated knowledge (91.7% vs. 5.6%, p<0.001), frequent/routine microbiological testing (100.0% vs. 55.6%, p<0.001), and empirical therapy (75.0% vs. 38.9%, p=0.008). Conclusion: The findings indicate generally high reported adherence to protocols but persistent gaps in microbiological testing, empirical antibiotic use, and professional education. Strengthening antimicrobial stewardship training, microbiological diagnostic capacity, and evidence-based prescribing protocols may support more rational antibiotic use in tertiary maternity care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tolegenkyzy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: