CODA-A: Residuals of Projections, Kernels, and Cokernels For a linear correction, residual(C, x) = x - Cx. If C² = C, the residual lies in ker(C), and equal residuals identify classes modulo im(C). Commuting linear maps transport residuals. A-T1–A-T7 are algebraic statements. The Lean model uses additive groups; A-T7 proves the unique underlying quotient function, while scalar linearity is proved in the manuscript and checked in finite rational matrix examples. A-T8 is a declared commitment without a proof. A-T9 assumes finite rational coordinate spaces with the coordinate l1 norm and im(C) = im(d0). The finite classifier calls a closed cochain with positive quotient distance ClosedResidual (the project-specific Anomalon). A residual supplies diagnostic data; it supplies no authorization or causal provenance. Artifacts and verification scope The manuscript is supplied as Markdown and TeX. Exact rational computation lives in `code/`, with edge, mutation, and regression tests in `code/tests/`. Three notebooks bind their imports to the local companion and solver; no ancestor repository path is inserted. Lean sources use the pinned `lean4/lean-toolchain` and no external mathlib package. See 000_quick_start.md for dependency installation and replay commands. Current test counts come from pytest collection, not this description. The current `lean4/axiom_report.txt` census covers the explicitly queried declarations and lists standard kernel dependencies including `propext` and `Quot.sound`. It records standard kernel dependencies and does not claim that every theorem is axiom-free.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeremy H. Carroll (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: