Key result
Optimal lifestyle score linked to ~19% lower odds of abnormal HbA1c.
Why the study?
The association of a lifestyle risk factor index with glycemic status considering BMI and visceral adipose tissue was unclear in a large population.
Is a healthy lifestyle risk factor index associated with a lower prevalence of abnormal HbA1c or self-reported diabetes in healthy adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=18,101)
Yes
Is a healthy lifestyle risk factor index associated with a lower prevalence of abnormal HbA1c or self-reported diabetes in healthy adults?
A healthy lifestyle score is weakly associated with lower HbA1c levels in predominantly healthy adults, though this relationship appears to be mediated by adiposity measures like BMI and visceral adipose tissue.
This cross-sectional analysis examined the association of a Lifestyle Risk Factor Index (LSRI) with the presence of self-reported diabetes or HbA1c levels among participants of the German National Cohort (NAKO), while considering the role of body mass index (BMI) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT). Modified LSRI (mLSRI) scores were calculated from baseline questionnaires assigning points for adherence to alcohol intake, physical activity, smoking, and healthy diet recommendations. Of > 205,000 participants, 18,101 had VAT quantified by magnetic resonance imaging plus complete information on covariates. Diabetes status was self-reported and HbA1c levels ≥ 39 mmol/mol Hb (5.7%) were considered elevated. Polytomous logistic regression estimated prevalence odds ratios (POR) and linear regression computed mean HbA1c levels adjusting for age and sex in model 1 and adding BMI and VAT for model 2. The respective proportions for 0/1, 2, 3, and 4 mLSRI points were 6%, 25%, 51%, and 18%. Among the 17,457 (96.4%) participants without self-reported diabetes, 17.3% had elevated HbA1c levels. Compared to normoglycemia, the highest vs. lowest mLSRI was inversely related to abnormal HbA1c (POR 0.81; 95%CI 0.68–0.97) but the associations were attenuated after adding BMI and VAT. No significant association was seen for diabetes (POR 0.91; 95%CI 0.62–1.32) after full adjustment. In this large sample of predominantly healthy adults, a combination of lifestyles, foremost driven by not smoking, was weakly associated with lower HbA1c levels but not self-reported diabetes. Nevertheless, lifestyle factors may be relevant for glycemic control, possibly due to an influence on adiposity, but this relation cannot be confirmed due to the cross-sectional design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maskarinec et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Predominantly healthy adults (n=18,101). Modified Lifestyle Risk Factor Index (mLSRI) vs. Lowest mLSRI score was evaluated on Abnormal HbA1c (≥ 39 mmol/mol Hb [5.7%]) (POR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.97). The highest versus lowest modified Lifestyle Risk Factor Index was inversely related to abnormal HbA1c (POR 0.81; 95% CI 0.68-0.97), though this association was attenuated after adjusting for BMI and VAT.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: