This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
N,N′-Disubstituted p-phenylenediamines (PPDs) and their oxidized derivatives (PPD-Qs) are widely used as rubber antioxidants, but their atmospheric sources remain incompletely characterized. Here we systematically investigate solid waste burning as a previously overlooked source of atmospheric PPDs and PPD-Qs. Field measurements of uncontrolled open burning and controlled incineration, combined with suspect screening and targeted analysis, revealed distinct emission profiles. Suspect screening detected and annotated 47 PPD-related features (20 confirmed, five tentatively identified, and 22 provisionally annotated), with more features detected in open burning PM2.5 (n = 43) than in incineration PM2.5 (n = 27). Quantitative analysis showed that open burning predominantly emitted parent PPDs at higher concentrations (median: 11.54 μg/g PM2.5), whereas incineration was characterized by a higher relative abundance of PPD-Qs (median: 2.50 μg/g PM2.5). In a screening-level esimate for China, open burning accounted for more than 99.7% of the estimated emissions of the 10 targeted ∑(PPDs + PPD-Qs) from solid waste burning in China. These findings suggest that solid waste burning is an overlooked source of atmospheric PPDs and PPD-Qs, indicating the need to incorporate waste disposal into emission inventories and targeted emission control strategies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: