Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rapeseed proteins are among the outstanding plant-based proteins due to their favorable interfacial functionality. This study evaluates the resource use of the most common rapeseed protein production routes – acidic precipitation, ultrafiltration and wet mild fractionation – using an exergy-based approach. The exergy consumption is normalized based on both product mass and protein functionality. Mass-based assessment indicates that the routes producing dry rapeseed protein concentrate exhibit relatively low exergy efficiencies (12.3 – 20.7%), mainly due to production of a single useful stream and dilute processing conditions that intensify the drying-related exergy demand. Wet mild fractionation shows the highest exergy efficiency at 47.3%, by distributing resource inputs across two useful products, oleosome cream and proteins. When evaluated based on protein functionality, however, ultrafiltration-based recovery of proteins from rapeseed meal and acid precipitation from cold-pressed cake emerge as the least exergy-intensive options to produce rapeseed protein-based emulsifiers. Therefore, the study shows that the resource use efficiency of a process is strongly dependent on the chosen evaluation criterion and highlights the importance of functionality-oriented valorisation of useful streams to enhance the efficiency of resources use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ayan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: