Purpose: Reliability in volume production can degrade gradually with lot-to-lot variation, and monitoring this statistically requires a separate test on every lot, which costs time and money. The c=0 outgoing gate test, by contrast, is already run for lot disposition and yields a failure count for every lot. This study examines whether across-lot gradual change can be monitored from these data without additional testing and over what region such monitoring is useful.Methods: Two previously proposed charts, GCCC and Bernoulli CUSUM, were used as evaluation tools in a simulation across a range of conditions. Both charts were designed for step changes while actual degradation is gradual, and they were evaluated with those designs left unchanged.Results: Bernoulli CUSUM attained the target ARL₀ of 500 and, among the conditions where GCCC could be matched to the same ARL₀, gave a higher probability of successful detection than GCCC in all 48 combinations of gradual-change conditions. Detection capability depends on the expected number of failures per lot and on the size of the change: at a ramp length of 50, 8 of the 16 combinations of these two met the 80% usefulness criterion. A twofold increase reached 79.9% at 0.1 expected failures per lot, close to the criterion, whereas a 1.5-fold increase reached only 70.9% even at the largest value of 0.3 and did not meet the criterion. Longer ramps lowered detection and narrowed the useful region.Conclusion: A failure-count chart cannot signal before the first failed lot, which is already out of specification (OOS), so the method detects trends rather than giving early warning, and ARL₀ calibration and initial estimation require care. Where the usefulness criterion is met, a supplementary monitoring scheme can be built from gate data without additional testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seong Won Choi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: