Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Influence of Bacillus-DFM and trace minerals sources on in vitro digestibility parameters of a feedlot diet. An in vitro study was conducted to evaluate the effects of a Bacillus-based probiotic and trace minerals source on in vitro fermentation characteristics using a standard high concentrate feedlot diet as substrate. A completely randomized design was used. Treatments included: 1) Control - no Bacillus (BVAC) and no Trace Minerals (TM); 2) BVAC; 3) Hydroxy Trace Minerals (HTM); BVAC + HTM; 5) Sulfate (SULF) and 6) BVAC + SULF (TM, HTM or SULF: Cu, Mn, or Zn with 10, 20, and 30 mg/kg DM respectively and BVAC: 3 g of B. licheniformis and B. subtilis per 70 L of ruminal fluid). Two hours post feeding, ruminal fluid was obtained from three steers fitted with ruminal cannula. Steers were fed the dairy the diet for 21 d prior to rumen fluid collection. The basal diet was ground to fit through a 2 mm screen and used as the substrate for in vitro incubations. Substrate (0.5 g) was incubated in 70 mL of a 1:1 mixture of ruminal fluid and McDougall’s buffer, at 39°C in a circulating water bath, in vaccine bottles. Vaccine bottles were purged with CO2, capped and sealed immediately after the McDougall’s buffer/rumen fluid mixture was added. Vaccine bottles remained sealed to maintain anaerobic conditions and were incubated for 6, 12, 24, and 48 h in triplicate for each treatment at each timepoint. To simulate rumen motility, vaccine bottles were gently swirled every 4 h. At the appropriate timepoints, vaccine bottles were removed from the water bath, gas pressure was recorded, pH determined, and then centrifuged at 28,000 x g. Following centrifugation, the supernatant decanted and the remaining digesta was dried at 100°C for 72 h and weighed to calculate DM disappearance (DMD). Data were analyzed as a completely randomized design using the GLM procedures in SAS. There were no treatment x time interactions (P > 0.05) for any of the response variables measured. Treatment and time affected (P < 0.05) DMD, pH, and gas pressure. Dry matter digestibility was greater (P < 0.05) in BVAC + HTM compared to all other treatments. In vitro pH was impacted by treatment. In vitro pH was greater (P < 0.05) in SULF compared to BVAC. Overall, BVAC combined with HTM improved in vitro DMD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leonel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: