What Is Wrong with Gossip? An Exclusion‐Based Account

This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.

Gossip is ubiquitous, yet morally troubling. Approximately 65% of human conversation involves evaluative talk about absent others, yet such talk often feels like backstabbing even when it causes no harm, violates no privacy, and consists entirely of truth. This article argues that gossip's distinctive wrong lies not in privacy violation, harm, or deception, but in something more fundamental which is the exclusion of targets from discourse about themselves. Building on this foundation, I develop three constraints on permissible gossip operating at different levels of moral analysis: participatory standing, purpose, and justice. These constraints together provide a framework for navigating gossip's complex moral terrain while respecting both the social value of information‐sharing and the dignity of those we discuss.