Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) offer flexible, three-dimensional access for air pollution monitoring, but rotor-induced aerodynamic disturbance can bias onboard sensor readings, an effect not yet well characterized for multi-rotor platforms. This paper presents a physics-informed framework unifying rotor wake characterization, turbulence zone classification, pollutant sensitivity analysis, sensor placement strategy, and bias correction into one design tool. Grounded in actuator disk momentum theory and literature-constrained relationships, it predicts or bounds measurement bias across nine pollutants and multiple rotor configurations, quantitative for seven sensor classes and provisional for O3 and VOCs. It also introduces a four-zone contamination classification and a two-stage bias correction for motion-induced and environmental factors. Hover and constant-speed co-location flight tests on a 21-inch quadrotor, comparing a UAV-mounted sensor against a fixed reference under Zone 4 conditions, support these predictions: observed bias (3–10% in hover; 6–15% at 5 m/s, across NO2, CO, O3, PM10, and PM2.5) was directionally consistent with the predictions, though correlation dropped as low as r = 0.44 in forward flight, below typical validation thresholds. The tests thus support the framework’s qualitative trends more than quantitative agreement, with wind-tunnel and multi-speed validation as natural next steps. The framework offers a reproducible foundation for UAV sensor integration design, uncertainty estimation, and campaign planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samadzadegan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: