Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Ewens sampling formula sits at the boundary α=0 of the two-parameter Pitman–Yor partition, and deciding whether data lie on it is an inferential question in which the strength θ is unknown. We give tests of α=0 that need no knowledge of θ. Conditioning on the block count, which is sufficient for the strength, gives a randomized score test with exact level at every sample size, and its score agrees, to the order of the local experiment, with the efficient one. The local experiment is anisotropic: the discount and the strength are learned at the rates (logn)−3/2 and (logn)−1/2, and after each coordinate is rescaled by its own rate, the experiment is a Gaussian shift on a half-plane cone for α≥0 and on the whole plane once the Dirichlet–multinomial branch α<0 is admitted. Profiling out the strength divides the discount information by four. The asymptotic score test attains the one-sided and two-sided local power bounds; whether the exact test attains them is open. At each fixed alternative with 0<α<1 and θ>0, the type II errors of both tests decay like n−(θ+α), which is the fastest rate available to any test whose level is controlled over all strengths. Simulations and an analysis of Williams’ Rothamsted moth abundances illustrate the tests.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: