Clinical survival analysis is often affected by missing not at random (MNAR) data, where missingness is due to underlying patient health states and clinical decision-making. Existing imputation methods struggle with threshold-based clinical missingness mechanisms. We propose MNAR-SVAE, a variational autoencoder integrating Cox proportional hazards loss, and introduce, for evaluation, a threshold-interaction MNAR mechanism capturing non-linear decision boundaries. We evaluate MNAR-SVAE against five baseline methods (standard VAE, MICE, missForest, GAIN, and MIDA) on METABRIC (breast cancer, $$N = 1904$$ ) and MIMIC-IV (sepsis, N = 25,439 ) under light, moderate, and severe missingness scenarios. MNAR-SVAE achieves the highest C-index on MIMIC-IV under severe missingness [C-index 0.693 (RSF), 0.693 (XGBoost)] and remains competitive under light [0.821 (RSF)] and moderate [0.778 (RSF)] conditions, with the performance advantage most pronounced under severe missingness, where LCox optimization preserves prognostic structure that reconstruction-focused methods fail to recover. On METABRIC, minimal performance variance is observed across all methods, indicating that the low-dimensional feature space in this dataset limits the marginal benefit of survival-supervised imputation. Overall, our results highlight the value of explicit survival-supervised generative modeling for handling informative missingness in clinical prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nads et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: