Drawing on feminist and queer theoretical perspectives, this article critiques the dominance of individualized, risk-focused frameworks in sexual violence primary prevention that obscure the structural and relational conditions shaping (un)safety. Strengths-based protective factors remain under-theorized in sexual violence and are often framed as tools to buffer against harm, rather than factors to cultivate community well-being. Interdisciplinary and community-led examples are explored to show how strength-based protective factors can transform sexual violence primary prevention. The authors argue for a reorientation of the field moving toward strength-based protective factors that prioritize the generative conditions that make sexual violence unimaginable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vrankovich et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: