The mechanisms of the reaction of CO 2 with hindered alkanolamines are described based on direct reaction monitoring with in situ 13 C NMR spectroscopy. Four amines of increasing steric hindrance were studied and compared with unhindered primary, secondary, and tertiary alkanolamines. The number and location of additional methyl (or other) groups on the nitrogen or adjacent carbon atoms create different degrees of steric hindrance. As steric hindrance increases, the Lewis basicity (nucleophilicity), as an affinity of the amine nitrogen to directly attack the electrophilic carbon of CO 2 and form a carbamate, decreases. At the same time, methyl (or other) groups present on nitrogen or adjacent carbon atoms do not change the Brønsted basicity of hindered amines. Coupled with lower Lewis basicity, the CO 2 –amine–water reaction equilibrium favors formation of bicarbonate, with higher CO 2 loading capacity and lower thermal stability, both of which are favorable properties for cyclic CO 2 capture. Due to lower stability of the hindered N–C bond of the carbamate, hindered amines AMP and MAP in aqueous solution show a phenomenon of steric acceleration: the more rapid transfer of CO 2 from the nitrogen of the amine (e.g., carbamate) to form the bicarbonate anion, maintaining relatively high reaction rates. A strong nucleophilic base such as piperazine present in the amine solution at low concentration maintains the high reaction rate by attacking free CO 2 and transferring it to the amine as bicarbonate. This described mechanism helps to improve CO 2 capture rates with severely hindered amines such as in the secondary amine MAMP, which without a promoter acts as a tertiary amine slowly reacting with CO 2 . The mechanism of chemical reaction between CO 2 and amines dissolved in methanol is similar to that in water—methanol attacks CO 2 and forms an O–C bond and methylbicarbonate anion (analogue of bicarbonate) with CO 2, which is stabilized by a protonated amine. The effects of amine concentration, CO 2 partial pressure, and temperature are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kortunov et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: