Let G(X) denote the size of the largest gap between consecutive primes below X. Answering a question of Erd} os, we show that G(X)> f(X) logX log logX log log log logX (log log logX) 2 ; where f(X) is a function tending to innity with X. Our proof combines existing arguments with a random construction covering a set of primes by arithmetic progressions. As such, we rely on recent work on the existence and distribution of long arithmetic progressions consisting entirely of primes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Green et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: