Key result
Endurance athletes are linked to ~35% lower AF ablation success vs. nonathletes at 24 months.
Why the study?
The outcomes of pulmonary vein isolation catheter ablation in endurance athletes with atrial fibrillation were not well characterized.
Does catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation result in different rates of freedom from atrial arrhythmias in endurance athletes compared to nonathletes?
Cohort (n=156)
Yes
Does catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation result in different rates of freedom from atrial arrhythmias in endurance athletes compared to nonathletes?
Relative Risk: 0.65 (95% CI 0.5–0.83)
p-value: p=<.001
Endurance athletes with atrial fibrillation have higher rates of atrial arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation compared to nonathletes, primarily due to atypical flutter, though the majority are able to return to their previous activity levels.
May warrant adjusted expectations for ablation outcomes in endurance athletes; leaves open need for prospective trials to guide management.
Objectives We aimed to investigate the outcomes of pulmonary vein isolation in athletes. Methods We retrospectively identified endurance athletes who underwent catheter ablation at our institution (2004–2018). Endurance athletes were defined as participating in competitive athletics for at least 1500 lifetime hours in sports at the IB or IIA Bethesda classification or higher. Primary endpoints were freedom from atrial arrhythmias at 12, 24, and 36 months after the procedure. Secondary endpoints were defined as qualitative improvement in symptoms allowing athletes to return to their previous level of activity. Athletes were compared with a control group of nonathletes in a 3‐to‐1 matched analysis by age and sex. Results A total of 39 endurance athletes who underwent catheter ablation were identified during the study period. At 12 months, there was no difference in treatment outcomes for athletes versus nonathletes (relative risk [RR], 1.06; 95% CI, 0.92–1.22; p = .40). Freedom from atrial arrhythmias was 35% less likely in athletes than nonathletes at 24 months (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.50–0.83; p < .001) and 42% less likely at 36 months (RR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41–0.79; p < .001). Overall, 77% of the athletes were able to return to their previous level of activity following catheter ablation. Conclusion Endurance athletes with atrial fibrillation appear to have higher rates of atrial arrhythmia recurrence than nonathletes after catheter ablation, with higher rates of atypical flutter. The majority of athletes were able to return to their previous level of activity after ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=156). High-endurance sports participation vs. Nonathletes was evaluated on Freedom from atrial arrhythmias at 24 months (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.50-0.83, p=<.001). Endurance athletes with atrial fibrillation were 35% less likely to be free from atrial arrhythmias at 24 months (RR 0.65) and 42% less likely at 36 months (RR 0.58) after catheter ablation compared to nonathletes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: