Key result
2.5D U-Net detects real-time TEE gaseous microemboli with ~93% precision.
Why the study?
Gaseous microemboli are common complications during cardiac structural interventions, but their detection and quantification via intraoperative TEE are challenging due to operator dependence and similar background structures.
Does a 2.5D U-Net architecture improve real-time detection of gaseous microemboli in TEE recordings of patients undergoing cardiac surgery compared to classical algorithms?
Does a 2.5D U-Net architecture improve real-time detection of gaseous microemboli in TEE recordings of patients undergoing cardiac surgery compared to classical algorithms?
A 2.5D U-Net architecture demonstrates technical feasibility for real-time, automated detection of gaseous microemboli during cardiac surgery using TEE.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates feasibility of real-time microemboli detection on intraoperative TEE; leaves open clinical utility for brain protection pending validation.
Gaseous microemboli (GME) represent a common complication of cardiac structural interventions across both surgical and transcatheter approaches. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) represents a convenient methodology to monitor and visualize the presence of circulating GME. However, their detection and quantification are far from trivial due to operator-dependent view, high velocity, and objects with similar structure in the background. Here, we propose a feasibility study based on a 2.5D U-Net architecture to detect GME in space-time connected data. We applied and tested such an architecture on a pilot dataset of eight TEE recordings (60 fps, 600×800 pixels) from eight different patients undergoing cardiac surgery, resulting in improved detection of moving GMEs against the background with respect to classical spot detection algorithms and 2D U-Net, yet retaining real-time execution speed with respect to more complex deep-learning architectures. Under leave-one-patient-out cross-validation, the selected model achieved strong detection performance under a three-pixel radius-tolerant grace-zone evaluation, with a precision of 92.55% and recall of 80.54%, corresponding to radius-tolerant Intersection over Union (IoU) and Dice coefficients of 73.95% and 84.13%, respectively. Complementarily, strict pixel-based segmentation metrics were also computed, yielding an IoU of 41.74% and a Dice coefficient of 57.98%. The selected model achieved an average inference time of 0.12 s per batch on the tested hardware. To assess specificity on unseen data, we additionally evaluated the model on an external GME-negative TEE dataset, where it produced predominantly empty or near-empty masks, indicating a low rate of spurious detections. These results support the technical feasibility of real-time GME segmentation, although broader clinical validation on larger multi-patient, multicenter datasets is still required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Angino et al. (2026) studied Gaseous microemboli during cardiac surgery (n=8). 2.5D U-Net architecture vs. Classical spot detection algorithms and 2D U-Net was evaluated on Gaseous microemboli detection (precision and recall). A 2.5D U-Net architecture for real-time gaseous microemboli detection in TEE achieved a precision of 92.55% and recall of 80.54%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: