Skin microvascular reactivity tests for the lower extremity apply stimuli such as ankle occlusion (post-occlusive reactive hyperemia, PORH), local heating (LH), or the vasoactive drug methyl nicotinate (MN). AIM: Evaluate microvascular reactivity in dorsal foot skin comparing PORH, LH and MN stimuli. METHOD: Thirty healthy participants 20-65 years of age were enrolled in a protocol using pointwise and imaging optical techniques for perfusion and oxygen saturation. Mean values and between-subjects coefficient of variation (CV) for perfusion and oxygen saturation were compared. RESULTS: The PORH, LH and MN stimuli caused significant increases in oxygen saturation and perfusion from baseline values (p < 0.001). The oxygen saturation was higher during LH than during PORH (pointwise technique; mean 88.8% vs 79.7%; p < 0.001) and higher during MN than during PORH (imaging; 86.7% vs 77.2%; p < 0.001). Perfusion was higher during LH than during PORH (pointwise; 1.60%RBC × mm/s vs 0.53%RBC × mm/s; p < 0.001) and higher during MN than during PORH (imaging; 1.04%RBC × mm/s vs 0.54%RBC × mm/s; p < 0.001). The CV for oxygen saturation was 2.8% vs 6.3% (pointwise; LH and PORH) and 7.4% vs 6.0% (imaging; MN and PORH). Corresponding values for perfusion were >30%. CONCLUSION: The responses in oxygen saturation and perfusion were higher during MN and LH stimuli than for PORH. A few outliers were observed after MN with a slower and lower response. Microcirculatory oxygen saturation has a lower between-subjects variation than perfusion (CV 3-7% vs >30%) during PORH, LH and MN stimuli.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Strömberg et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: