Key result
Multiple imaging artifacts and nonthrombotic entities can mimic acute pulmonary embolism on CT angiography.
Why the study?
Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism can be challenging due to mimics on CT angiography that may lead to misdiagnosis and detrimental patient outcomes.
This review highlights the importance of recognizing mimics of acute pulmonary embolism on CT angiography to avoid misdiagnosis and unnecessary anticoagulation.
Heightened awareness of PE mimics on CTA may reduce misdiagnosis; review leaves open prospective outcome validation.
Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) can be challenging for both clinicians and radiologists. CT angiography (CTA) has emerged as the most practical imaging modality to ensure accurate and prompt recognition of acute PEs. Thus, radiologists are positioned as the first physicians able to confirm a diagnosis of acute PE in clinically suspected cases. However, in addition to identifying acute PE on CTA, radiologists also must be aware of its mimics. Misdiagnosis of PE can result in detrimental patient outcomes, exposing patients unnecessarily to the risks of anticoagulation and delaying recognition of any true underlying pathology. In this article, we discuss entities that can be mistaken for acute PE on CTA. These mimics include artifacts, nonvascular abnormalities, and various causes of filling defects in the pulmonary vasculature, both thrombotic and nonthrombotic. The objectives of this article are to familiarize the reader with mimics of acute PE and to review the characteristic features that differentiate them from acute PE on CT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rivaud et al. (2022) conducted a review in Acute pulmonary embolism mimics. CT angiography was evaluated. Various entities, including artifacts, nonvascular abnormalities, and nonthrombotic filling defects, can mimic acute pulmonary embolism on CT angiography and must be differentiated to avoid misdiagnosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: