Key result
Expert consensus outlines practical techniques and guidance for bioresorbable scaffold implantation in bifurcation lesions.
Why the study?
Bifurcation lesions are a large and challenging subset in interventional cardiology, but initial experience and clear recommendations for bioresorbable scaffold use in these lesions are lacking.
Provides experience-based insights and practical guidance for bioresorbable scaffold implantation in coronary bifurcation lesions.
BVS in bifurcations carries technical risks; leaves open whether any long-term benefit over metallic stents emerges.
Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds have been recently introduced as a novel paradigm for coronary artery disease treatment allowing temporary vessel support and drug delivery without indefinite coronary caging, potentially reducing the long-term limitation of metallic stents. The scientific community has rapidly embraced this concept and bioresorbable devices have been introduced in clinical practice. However, despite the fact that bifurcation lesions represent a large and challenging subset in the field of interventional cardiology, this subgroup of lesions have been avoided in the initial experience with bioresorbable scaffolds and clear recommendations on methodological approaches are lacking. In the present report, we describe the various techniques for bifurcation treatment with bioresorbable scaffolds and the theoretical advantages and disadvantages of this technology in different scenarios, with a glimpse to challenging subsets and possible complications. Therefore, we aim to provide experience based insights and practical guidance for bioresorbable scaffold implantation in bifurcation lesions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Diletti et al. (2016) conducted a review in Coronary bifurcation lesions. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds was evaluated. This report provides experience-based insights and practical guidance for bioresorbable scaffold implantation in coronary bifurcation lesions, describing various techniques and theoretical advantages.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: