Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The authors reiterate the validity of the ESC 0/1-h algorithm using high-sensitivity troponin assays for diagnosing or excluding AMI in patients with non-ST-segment elevation chest pain.
standards for these hs-cTn assays, which would standardize the 99th percentile URL and increase the accuracy of the assay.In our study, a systematic review and meta-analysis, albeit somewhat imprecise, we confirmed that the ESC 0/1-h algorithm with both hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT has valid diagnostic performance for the diagnosis and exclusion of AMI in patients with chest pain without ST-segment elevation.1 At this present time, we reiterate the need to understand the diagnostic performance of the assay methods employed at each institution and to use them clinically.Second, Tada et al pointed out an error for the fifthgeneration troponin T assay.We are grateful for this and are considering issuing an Erratum.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kikuchi et al. (2022) conducted a letter in Acute myocardial infarction. 0-hour/1-hour algorithm with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T and I was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: