The proliferation of smart devices exposes children to online risks like grooming and financial scams that are deeply embedded within legitimate applications. Current approaches rely on automated prevention and detection, a paradigm that is fundamentally limited by its inherent fallibility. Whether rule-based or AI-driven, they inevitably produce false positives and negatives, failing to provide reliable protection. In this paper, we argue for a complementary, human-in-the-loop, post-hoc forensic paradigm. We present GUIA uditor , the first system designed to realize this vision by creating GUI Provenance: a queryable, semantic record of a child's interaction sequence. To generate this, GUIA uditor leverages a Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) to translate the temporal sequence of GUI events into a human-understandable narrative. To make this practical on mobile devices, a novel evidence distillation pipeline reduces the data requiring analysis by over 89.2% compared to periodic sampling approaches adopted by industry standards, with negligible impact on accuracy. On a new dataset of 295 interaction clips, GUIA uditor achieves a 95.23% Macro-F1 Score in logging significant events and, crucially, its two-stage forensic query engine successfully retrieves the correct evidence as the top result for over 90.20% of natural language questions. An end-to-end evaluation on three modern smartphones shows that the full pipeline, including on-device MLLM inference, adds 2.1W of power draw and 7.4s of per-event latency, with a peak memory footprint of ~3.1GB. These results show that post-hoc GUI forensics can run on modern mobile devices and provide useful context for guardian-led safety review.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: