BackgroundKnee joint position sense (JPS) is a vital component of proprioception, significantly impacting functional performance and clinical outcomes.ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the concurrent validity and the intra- and inter-tester reliability of APECS-derived JPS error measures during three different squat ranges.MethodsSixty-two participants (mean age: 25.5 ± 3.9 years) were evaluated across three sessions. Knee JPS was measured at low (30-50°), moderate (50-70°), and deep (70-90°) squat ranges. Concurrent validity was evaluated by comparing APECS-derived JPS error measures with digital goniometer-derived measures. Intra-tester reliability was assessed by comparing Sessions 2 and 3 (T1), and inter-tester reliability by comparing T1 and T2 in Session 3. JPS error was quantified using absolute (AAE), relative (RAE), and variable (VAE) angular errors.ResultsCorrelations between APECS- and digital goniometer-derived JPS error measures were low and non-significant across all ranges (r = -0.22 to 0.08). Intra-tester reliability was good only for AAE (ICC = 0.85) and RAE (ICC = 0.79) in the deep squat range, with poor reliability elsewhere. Inter-tester reliability was predominantly poor, with moderate reliability only for VAE in the moderate range (ICC = 0.69).ConclusionUnder the present protocol, APECS-derived JPS error measures showed limited agreement with digital goniometer-derived measures and inconsistent reliability across squat ranges and error parameters. These findings are specific to the present APECS-based assessment protocol and reference method and should not be generalized to the overall validity or reliability of the APECS application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akbaş et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: