Editorial Scope of the Series, Honesty about Limits, and Non-Claims Policy G-Flux Theoretical Physics Notes is an electronic, diamond open-access series devoted to theoretical physics and relativity: reduced formalisms, stability analysis, order-of-magnitude estimates, and falsifiable predictions. The first issue publishes the Phase A case base of the TAC-MAG framework (Causal Asymmetry Theory and Gozategui Accretion Metric), already deposited on Zenodo and prepared as a working paper for the gr-qc community. The series is not a vehicle for technological promises. The TAC-MAG case base recognizes a gap of approximately forty-seven orders of magnitude between the kinetic energy density available in zodiacal dust and the density required for a useful metric deformation on a kilometre scale. Accordingly, the formalism is classified strictly as a theoretical hypothesis. No claim is made of propulsion, power extraction, or metric engineering of a habitat from that coupling. In the case base the asymmetry tensor is auxiliary, so the tensor sector remains that of general relativity and the gravitational-wave speed satisfies c_T = c, consistent with multimessenger constraints. The only short-term quantitative prediction retained is a fractional proper-time residual of order 5×10⁻⁸ per year at the reference coupling, to be sought—if at all—after subtraction of the standard relativistic background. Horizon Space Station and any habitat-engineering line remain on a separate track grounded in established physics and engineering, independent of whether TAC-MAG is confirmed or refuted. Conflating the two discourses would weaken both the hypothesis and the engineering work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
José Gozategui (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: