Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study explores the valorization of phosphogypsum (PG) in clay-based composites for sustainable production of bricks, addressing key factors such as drying behavior, mechanical performance, microstructure, porosity, and radiological safety. The analysis of drying kinetics reveals a rapid mass loss during the first 120 min, with intermediate PG–clay ratios (50:50) promoting optimal pore connectivity. Mechanical testing of fired composites indicates that green clay–PG (50:50) has the greatest performance, with a Young’s modulus over 2000 MPa and a maximum load capacity of 4000 N. Additionally, porosity decreases from ∼40% in the unfired condition to ∼10% after firing. Microstructural analysis confirms well-connected sintering necks and a cohesive clay–PG network. Radiological assessment indicates radium-equivalent activity of ≈50 Bq/kg for green clay composites, safely below the regulatory limit of 370 Bq/kg, while yellow PG formulations approach 257.6 Bq/kg. A multi-criteria optimization identifies the PG50–G50 (green clay) formulation as optimal, providing a balanced combination of mechanical strength, structural integrity, low porosity, and radiological safety. These findings indicate that fired PG–clay composites represent a viable route for producing high-performance, eco-friendly construction materials, supporting waste valorization, circular economy concepts, and advancing sustainable building practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hafiene et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: