Caputo fractional derivatives describe causal power-law memory, whereas the fractional Fourier transform represents continuous rotations in the time–frequency plane. This study derives an Abel–Gaussian-regularized coupling for endpoint-compatible causal signals. Unlike a direct composition of the two operators, the coupling is induced by embedding the causal Caputo convolution into a chirp-conjugated fractional convolution compatible with the adopted transform phase convention. Evaluation of the two transform branches shows that their quadratic phases cancel the additional convolution phase. On a compactly supported smooth core, removal of the regularization yields a rotation–memory–rotation factorization in which the fractional-memory multiplier acts at the ordinary Fourier node and the outer rotation maps the weighted spectrum to the prescribed fractional domain. At the discrete level, modulo-four reduction of the transform order is kept separate from decomposition of the derivative order, while a one-sided Grünwald–Letnikov approximation preserves causal history accumulation. Numerical experiments confirm fixed-spectral rotation identities and forward–inverse reconstruction at double-precision roundoff, approximately first-order convergence to an analytic Caputo reference, and decreasing low-frequency discrepancies under grid refinement. Further tests distinguish the effects of the sampling interval, observation length, fractional order, and nonzero endpoint traces. Exact boundary-term retention preserves the finite record, whereas compatible tapering produces a modified surrogate. For the tested dense implementations, the spectral implementation is faster than the direct full-history Grünwald–Letnikov implementation, while the shared dense operators dominate the storage requirements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: