State-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) deployed across global contexts exhibit pronounced normative monoculture, routinely prioritizing Western, Educated, Industri alized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) ethical paradigms while marginalizing non-Western epistemologies. This structural bias imposes unilateral normative baselines on pluriversal societies. We present Amono AI, an open-source, prompt-conditioned framework architected on Google AI Studio and the Gemini API that enforces epistemic pluriversality through a multi-framework deliberative mechanism termed the Council of Epistemic Minds. Rather than arbitrating a single moral verdict, Amono AI dynam ically projects ethical dilemmas across four parallel philosophical traditions: (1) Indic / Dharmic Ethics, (2) Collectivist / Communal Ethics, (3) Indigenous & Biocentric Stewardship, and (4) Western Liberal Frameworks under strict, mode-dependent token budgets. We validate the framework across a two-tier empirical audit: a 5-scenario micro-benchmark on gemini-3.7-flash (N = 10) achieving 100% word-budget compliance, and an extended 50 dilemma macro-scale benchmark across five societal domains on gemini-3.6-flash (N = 100). Across all 100 macro-scale trials, Amono AI maintained 92.0% Compact compliance (≤ 100 words) and 100.0% Analytic compliance (≤ 250 words), achieving a maximal Shannon Equitability score of EH = 1.0000. Our results substantiate that structured prompt conditioning provides a computationally lightweight, robust mechanism to neutralize monocultural alignment bias without catastrophic forgetting or parameter retraining.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmed Bin Ajaz Bazaz (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: