Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sparse voltage measurements make fault-bus localization depend on measurement placement and the physical distinguishability of location labels. We evaluate a deterministic, label-independent topology-guided placement protocol with physically governed localization classes and leakage-resistant condition-level validation on IEEE39 and IEEE123. In the original base protocols, topology-guided CNN1D Top-1 accuracy exceeded the prespecified primary-random layouts by 4.55 and 1.67 percentage points, respectively, although both paired bus-by-condition intervals included zero. In the reviewer-driven 1701-event IEEE39 physical-condition extension, Top-1 was 0.3683 for topology-guided placement and 0.3564 for primary random; the paired difference was +0.0119 with a 95% interval of −0.0493 to 0.0898, which also included zero. Separately, complete enumeration of all 84 feasible IEEE39 k = 3 layouts ranked the topology-guided layout first in Top-1 accuracy, Macro-F1, and mean-hop error under the frozen CNN1D protocol. Load-shift tests produced near-chance Top-1 values, and resistance-shift performance was lower at 20 Ω than at 0.1 Ω. Fixed-capacity, classifier, noise, timing, confusion, and topology-error analyses further bounded the result. The evidence supports reproducible pre-training measurement planning within the tested simulations without establishing statistically certain or universal superiority.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xing et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: