Feed spacers can promote membrane-side transport in flat-sheet ultrafiltration channels, but the accompanying hydraulic resistance increases pumping demand. This study combined pure-water pressure-drop measurements with transient three-dimensional ANSYS Fluent simulations to compare a commercial 2/1 twill-woven spacer (T-Base) and 16 systematically varied candidate configurations. A geometry-resolved finite-volume model was evaluated through computational-domain, mesh, and time-step sensitivity assessments; the predicted pressure gradients agreed with the measurements with a mean relative deviation below 4%. The methodological novelty lies in integrating pressure-normalized near-wall efficacy, bilateral wall shear stress balance, and equal-area spatial sampling within a geometry-resolved, multi-indicator framework for comparing spacer configurations with different periodic lengths and mesh densities. At a 60° low attack angle and a superficial inlet velocity of 0.0551 m·s−1, T3823 (filament spacing 0.38 mm, filament diameter 0.23 mm, spacer thickness 0.44 mm) provided the most favorable hydrodynamic trade-off among the 16 candidates. It produced a near-membrane velocity of 0.0220 m·s−1 and a pressure gradient of 53.5 kPa·m−1; its pressure-normalized near-wall efficacy was 1.23 relative to T-Base. T3823 also reduced bilateral membrane shear deviation from 24.91% to 8.30% and near-wall velocity dispersion by 50.7%. Overall, the results highlight the value of coordinated spacer-geometry optimization for balancing near-membrane flow enhancement and hydraulic resistance, with T3823 emerging as the most promising configuration among the candidates evaluated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: