Flavor chemistry and nutritional quality are the core attributes determining the commercial value and consumer acceptance of ready-to-eat meals. This study developed a Transformer-based multimodal deep learning framework that integrates systematic flavor chemistry profiles, physicochemical nutrient indices, and visual features to achieve intelligent synchronous assessment of flavor and nutritional quality of ready-to-eat meals solely from product images. The model achieved 91.5% classification accuracy in distinguishing 32 ready-to-eat meal variants, comprising pork-, chicken-, and beef-based meals, and demonstrated strong predictive performance for key nutrients, with determination coefficients ( R 2 ) of 0.86 for protein, 0.80 for fat, and 0.79 for carbohydrate after weighted-Huber optimization, indicating high consistency with physicochemical measurements. Systematic flavor chemistry characterization via headspace solid-phase microextraction/gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME/GC-MS) identified 77 volatile flavor compounds, among which 22 key odor-active compounds with an odor activity value (OAV) ≥ 1 were screened, with aldehydes and spice-derived terpenes identified as major contributors to flavor differentiation among products. Consumer evaluation ( n = 100) revealed that flavor attributes dominated purchase decisions, and the model accurately identified core flavor descriptors of products. The proposed model provides a rapid image-based approach for predicting flavor-related attributes and nutritional quality of ready-to-eat meals. In the future, the framework could serve as an AI-assisted quality-control tool in centralized kitchens or ready-to-eat meal enterprises, while also being developed into a consumer-oriented AI application for image-based estimation of macronutrients and calories and personalized meal recommendations based on flavor preferences and nutritional needs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: