Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Overview This record contains the manuscript, computational framework artifacts, candidate sequence datasets, and wet-lab experimental protocols for "De Novo Engineering of pH-Conditional, Cross-Species EGFR Binders via Higher-Dimensional ToposLang and Pharmacological Lattice Quantisation". Targeted therapeutics against Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) are frequently constrained by severe on-target off-tumor toxicities and preclinical translation failures caused by cross-species sequence divergence. This work introduces a coordinate-free, topologically verified de novo protein design framework bridging Pharmacological Lattice Quantisation (PLQ) and ToposLang (7-Lang). The deposit includes 20 Pareto-optimal single-chain constructs (84-117 amino acids) presenting a histidine-switch electrostatic paratope directed against the conserved Domain III Cetuximab epitope. Key Features and Results pH-Conditional Switch Dynamic Range: Candidates exhibit potent binding in the acidic tumor microenvironment (Δ Gbind ≤ -14.81 kcal/mol at $pH = 6.5$) while remaining biochemically silent at physiological serum pH (Δ Gbind ≥ +3.38 kcal/mol at $pH = 7.4$), establishing a thermodynamic switch delta of ΔΔ G ≥ +18.19 kcal/mol. Cross-Species Equivalence: Binding thermodynamics are balanced between Human (UniProt: P00533) and Mouse (UniProt: Q01279) EGFR (ΔΔ Gspecies ≤ 0.16 kcal/mol). Folding Confidence and Sequence Novelty: The candidates exhibit high structural confidence (pLDDT ≥ 88.0, PAE < 4.0) alongside low sequence identity (≤ 30.8% to known reference binders), achieving $3/4$ and $4/4$ novelty scores by purging natural homology loops. Deterministic Assembly: Sequence generation is governed by exact rational Combinatorial Hodge Laplacians (L₁ = B₁T B₁ + B₂ B₂T), terminating deterministically upon Betti number annihilation (β₁ = ( L₁) = 0). Theoretical Framework and Methodological Notes Discrete Topological Representation: Molecular interaction manifolds are formalized as Directed Acyclic Cell Complexes (DACCs) where boundary nilpotency (∂ₖ₋₁ ∘ ∂ₖ ≡ 0) is statically enforced at compile time. Clifford Conformal Geometric Algebra (R4,1,0): Rigid docking transformations use coordinate-free multivector versor sandwich operators (A' = M A M̄) instead of Cartesian rotation matrices. Compiler Optimization (-topos-symbolic-gnc): An MLIR dialect lowering pass simplifies blade expressions at compile time and packs non-zero multivector coefficients into 64-byte/128-byte SIMD cache lines for lock-free concurrency. Histidine Bifold Manifold: Intrinsic acid dissociation constants (pKₐ ≈ 6.0-6.2) are mapped into a discrete ternary state space T ∈ \-1, 0, +1\ to drive conditional salt-bridge formation at $pH = 6.5$ and severe desolvation penalties at $pH = 7.4$. File Manifest paper.pdf: Full preprint manuscript detailing the mathematical foundations, MLIR optimization passes, candidate profiling, and wet-lab protocols. submission.csv: Complete metadata and sequence entries for all 20 Pareto-optimal candidate constructs (ToposEGFR-C1-004 through ToposEGFR-C1-099), including sequence lengths, binding energies, $pLDDT$ scores, novelty tiers, and Hodge loop closure status. SOP_experimental_validation.md: Complete Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for recombinant expression in E. coli SHuffle T7 Express, pET-22b(+) vector cloning, Ni-NTA/SEC purification, Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) kinetic assays, and flow cytometry on A431 cells. src/: Core source repositories for the ToposLang language engine and PLQ quantization framework. Technical and Execution Requirements Compiler Environment: ToposLang compiler suite (topos-lang) with MLIR/LLVM toolchain integration. Framework Dependencies: Pharmacological Lattice Quantization (PLQ) execution environment. Hardware Optimization: AVX-512 compatible x86_64 CPU recommended for SIMD multivector evaluation pipelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elias Oulad Brahim (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: