Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study introduces K-text, a website designed to measure Korean language proficiency from second language writing and speech data through 20 complexity, accuracy, and fluency indices using natural language processing. A key advantage of K-text is its ability to measure accuracy and fluency in addition to complexity. To test the 20 indices’ preliminary validity, this study investigates whether they can predict overall criterion-based Korean proficiency from 1 to 6 (equivalent to A1 to C2) when they are used to analyze 45,855 second language learners’ essays from the Korean Learner Corpus. The findings show that all of the individual K-text indices are significant predictors of overall Korean proficiency. Together, the 20 indices accounted for 44.50% of the variation observed in proficiency scores. These results suggest that K-text is a valuable resource for analyzing Korean language production data in relation to overall proficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haerim Hwang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: