Noncollinear magnetism in strong-exchange materials is governed by the competition between isotropic exchange, anisotropic exchange, spin–orbit coupling, geometric frustration, orbital hybridization, and itinerant-electron motion. Conventional density functional theory can describe noncollinear magnetic states throughspin-density matrices and spinor Kohn–Sham equations. However, a gauge-theoreticalformulation provides a more unified description of spatially varying spin orientations, chiral exchange, spin transport, and emergent electromagnetic responses.This work proposes a DFT–Yang–Mills model in which the local spin frame isrepresented by an element of the non-Abelian group SU(2). A spatially varyingmagnetization generates an emergent gauge potential,Aµ(r) = −iU†(r)∂µU(r) = Aaµ(r)σa2. (1)where U(r) is a local spin rotation and σa are the Pauli matrices. The correspondingnon-Abelian field strength isFµν = ∂µAν − ∂νAµ − ig[Aµ, Aν]. (2)The proposed theory treats the gauge field as an emergent internal structure generated by local spin geometry, spin–orbit coupling, crystal symmetry, and electronichybridization. The model combines self-consistent noncollinear density functionaltheory with an effective Yang–Mills energy functional. This allows the exchangetensor, Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction, spin stiffness, scalar spin chirality, andmagnetic topological charge to be described within a common mathematical framework.The main hypothesis is that exchange interactions in strong-exchange materialscan be expressed as the gauge-covariant electronic response to spatial variations ofthe local spin frame. The approach is applicable to spin spirals, frustrated antiferromagnets, chiral magnets, magnetic skyrmions, noncollinear superexchange, andmagnetoelastic coupling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khaled Aldhufri (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: