Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Decision-making under uncertainty requires mathematical tools capable of capturing the complexity of real-world expert evaluations. Linear Diophantine fuzzy sets address this need by incorporating reference parameters alongside membership and non-membership degrees, offering greater flexibility than earlier fuzzy frameworks. However, existing distance measures for this setting rely entirely on component-wise differences and can fail to distinguish between two elements whenever those differences are equal. This paper proposes a new distance measure that extends the standard component-wise sum by introducing cross-interaction terms between the membership degrees and between the reference parameters of the two elements under consideration. Axiomatic validity is established through a formal proof, and the measure is compared against nine existing distance measures, revealing cases where existing measures lose discriminating power while the proposed one does not. Building on this distance, a CODAS-based multi-criteria decision-making procedure is developed for the linear Diophantine fuzzy environment and applied to a logistics specialist selection problem. Results are benchmarked against existing methods, and the consistency of the proposed approach is discussed alongside its limitations and directions for future work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ebru Aydoğdu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: