Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The mirror neuron network is activated during both execution and observation of the same action, enabling visual-to-motor transformation. Two main hypotheses account for this process: the direct matching hypothesis proposes a direct link between visual cues and the observer's motor representations, whereas the predictive hypothesis suggests that motor predictions are generated and compared with visual information. We tested these hypotheses during a locomotion task. Motor prediction was assessed by comparing actual and imagined walking (forward or backward) over a 9 m path. Action observation (AO) was examined through a time-estimation inference task in which participants observed an agent walking 3 m before occlusion and estimated when the agent would reach the end of the 9 m path. We manipulated these tasks by mechanically vibrating the leg muscles, creating sensory illusions. We found that vibration-induced sensory illusions altered motor imagery timing, affecting sensorimotor prediction. Opposite effects on AO and numerical simulations supported the predictive hypothesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hilt et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: