Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Children in care are socially vulnerable due to their adverse early experiences. Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy (DDP) is a promising intervention for these children, yet empirical support is limited. This study evaluates the feasibility and acceptability of the ‘Foundations for Attachment’, a DDP-informed group intervention for foster carers. Methods: This mixed methods study did not use a control group. Recruitment, retention and completion rates of outcomes measures, as well as participant feedback, were used to evaluate feasibility and acceptability. Standardised outcome measures were completed at baseline, post-intervention, and one-month follow-up. Descriptive statistics and the Reliable Change Index were used to evaluate the suitability of the measures. Brief content analysis was used to evaluate open-ended qualitative questions related to the acceptability of the intervention. Results: There was substantial attrition from the opt-in to the completion of the baseline measures, with further attrition at the post-intervention and follow-up time points. Content analysis of participant feedback suggested the intervention was acceptable, although outcome measures were identified as time-consuming. The outcome measures were ineffective in capturing individual-level change. Conclusions: This feasibility study highlights key challenges in recruitment and retention that must be addressed in future trials. The outcome measures used in this study warrant reconsideration in a future trial. Intervention research of this kind is important as targeted interventions for this group are needed. Thesis is embargoed until 31st December 2028.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brid O'Connell (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: