Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The thesis comprises of two studies. The first was systematic review and meta-analysis of bullying prevalence amongst post-primary children in the United Kingdom. 45 eligible studies were found and prevalence meta-analysis provided pooled prevalence estimates of bullying across three time periods (1993-2002, 2003-2012, 2013-2022). For 2013-2022 the pooled prevalence estimates were as follows: victims of traditional bullying 23%, perpetrators of traditional bullying 10%, victims of cyberbullying 15%, preparators of cyberbullying 8%. Insufficient studies prevented a meta-analysis of bully/victims prevalence but relevant studies ranged from 1% to 20%. The second was an empirical study which explored the association between sex, age, adverse childhood experiences and bullying with attenuated symptoms of psychosis. A hierarchical multiple regression explored four models combing age, sex, ACEs, traditional bullying and cyberbullying and their relationship to the PQ16 in 1528 adults (18-35) . The final regression model, which combined all forms of bullying, age, sex, and ACEs explained 15% of variance in relation to the number of items endorsed on the PQ16. Traditional forms of bullying made a unique contribution of 4.6% to the regression model and this was increased by 0.6% when cyberbullying was also included. Although sex showed a significant association with the number of items endorsed on the PQ16 in the first regression model, this relationship disappeared when ACEs were introduced.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Callum Urquhart (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: