Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Australian Government introduced a nationwide mpox MVA-BN vaccine to all eligible individuals at higher risk of mpox exposure, specifically gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM). Self-reported vaccination status is commonly used in surveillance and behavioural research, but its accuracy for mpox vaccination is unknown. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of GBMSM aged ≥16 years who attended the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (MSHC) between 7 December 2023 and 31 December 2024. Self-reported mpox vaccination status using computer-assisted self-interviewing (CASI) was compared to verified electronic health records. Sensitivity, specificity, and agreement (κ) were calculated alongside other measures of performance. Of 6050 eligible men, 5885 men self-reported their mpox vaccination status: 48.6% ( n = 2859) vaccinated, 44.6% ( n = 2623) unvaccinated, and 6.8% ( n = 403) unsure. Self-reported mpox vaccination had a sensitivity of 96.9% (95% CI: 95.9% to 97.7%), a specificity of 65.4% (95% CI: 63.9% to 66.9%), a positive predictive value of 52.4% (95% CI: 50.6% to 54.3%), a negative predictive value of 98.2% (95% CI: 97.6% to 98.6%), and an accuracy of 74.3% (95% CI: 73.1% to 75.5%). Our results demonstrated that the majority of GBMSM correctly reported their vaccination status. While self-reported mpox vaccination demonstrates high sensitivity, moderate agreement indicates residual misclassification and incomplete capture of vaccinations in the electronic health record used for validation. This suggests that while self-report is reliable for confirming non-vaccination, it is less reliable for identifying vaccinated individuals, underscoring the importance of electronic health record verification for accurate vaccine surveillance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mozaffari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: