Key result
CYP2C19 loss-of-function variants linked to ~15-fold higher rate of discharge ticagrelor prescribing in AIS/TIA.
Why the study?
Clopidogrel effectiveness for secondary stroke prevention is affected by CYP2C19 genetic variation, and real-world implementation of CYP2C19-guided P2Y12 inhibitor therapy depends on factors like timely result availability.
Does rapid CYP2C19 genotyping improve tailored P2Y12 inhibitor prescribing in patients with acute ischemic stroke or TIA?
Cohort (n=467)
Yes
Does rapid CYP2C19 genotyping improve tailored P2Y12 inhibitor prescribing in patients with acute ischemic stroke or TIA?
Relative Risk: 15.4 (95% CI 8.6–27.4)
Absolute Event Rate: 87% vs 5.7%
p-value: p=< 0.0001
Rapid CYP2C19 genotyping can be efficiently implemented in clinical practice to successfully guide tailored P2Y12 inhibitor prescribing for secondary stroke prevention.
CYP2C19-guided P2Y12i CDS alerts promoted alternative prescribing on ~22% of days; leaves open whether refined implementation improves stroke outcomes.
Clopidogrel is first‐line for secondary stroke prevention, but its effectiveness is affected by CYP2C19 genetic variation. An American Heart Association (AHA) scientific statement concluded that CYP2C19 ‐guided P2Y12 inhibitor (P2Y12i) therapy is evidence‐supported, though real‐world application depends on implementation factors (e.g., timely, understandable results). This prospective observational cohort quality improvement project used data from three comprehensive stroke centers within one health system, each offering rapid CYP2C19 testing. Eligible patients had CYP2C19 testing ordered, a P2Y12i prescribed (clopidogrel or ticagrelor), or a P2Y12i indication. Consensus recommendations were clopidogrel for CYP2C19 normal/rapid/ultrarapid metabolizers (NM/RM/UM) and ticagrelor for intermediate/poor metabolizers (IM/PM). The primary target population was patients with acute ischemic stroke or TIA (AIS/TIA) prescribed a P2Y12i. The primary outcome was the proportion of discharge ticagrelor prescriptions (among P2Y12i users) with AIS/TIA, compared between IM/PM and NM/RM/UM groups. Secondary endpoints included test turnaround time (TAT), result availability before discharge, and alignment of discharge P2Y12i with consensus recommendations (PGx‐aligned prescribing). The evaluation period was September 2024–August 2025. Results were available for 467 patients; 451 (97%) had results before discharge, with a median TAT of 5.2 hours (interquartile range 3.3–9.6). Of 337 patients prescribed a P2Y12i at discharge, 296 had AIS/TIA. Clinicians more often selected ticagrelor over clopidogrel for IM/PMs than NM/RM/UMs (89 of 102 [87%] vs. 11 of 194 [5.7%]; RR 15.4; 95% CI: 8.6–27.4; P < 0.0001). PGx‐aligned prescribing occurred in 272 (92%) of 296 patients. Rapid CYP2C19 testing efficiently translates into tailored P2Y12i prescribing in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (AIS/TIA) (n=467). CYP2C19 intermediate/poor metabolizer (IM/PM) status vs. CYP2C19 normal/rapid/ultrarapid metabolizer (NM/RM/UM) status was evaluated on Proportion of discharge ticagrelor prescriptions (among P2Y12i users) with AIS/TIA (RR 15.4, 95% CI 8.6-27.4, p=< 0.0001). Clinicians prescribed ticagrelor significantly more often for CYP2C19 intermediate/poor metabolizers than for normal/rapid/ultrarapid metabolizers (87% vs 5.7%; RR 15.4; 95% CI 8.6-27.4; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: