The rapid expansion of renewable capacity in China is increasingly depressing wholesale electricity prices and exacerbating revenue inadequacy for renewable generators. This cost-recovery pressure has made the contract-for-difference (CfD) mechanism a major subsidy instrument for renewable energy in China. However, this out-of-market revenue-stabilizing mechanism raises concerns about its impacts on electricity market operation. Increasingly frequent negative prices in China further motivate a systematic assessment of how this CfD mechanism affects wholesale markets. Here, the impacts of the CfD mechanism on price formation, settlement composition, and participant profitability in multi-timescale electricity markets are investigated. A multi-timescale electricity market model incorporating the CfD mechanism is developed within a bi-level optimization framework. Strategic bidding by heterogeneous market participants is modeled at the upper level, with market clearing performed at the lower level. The top-down decomposition of contract positions across the annual, monthly, and spot markets is formulated together with CfD-related constraints. A hierarchical deep reinforcement learning framework is designed to decompose multi-timescale bidding decisions into stage-specific learning tasks. Market-feasible demonstrations are further embedded to guide exploration in large continuous bidding spaces, achieving a 25.4% increase in the average reward of renewable agents. Results show that an 80% CfD coverage ratio substantially increases the negative spot price share to 39% in the high renewable scenario. Moreover, CfD-based settlement (200.6 CNY/MWh) overtakes market-based settlement (105.4 CNY/MWh) as the dominant component of the load-side settlement composition. Compared with expanding coverage alone, jointly adjusting coverage ratios and settlement prices may help manage the trade-off between revenue support and potential market distortions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: