Semantic segmentation of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery remains challenging due to speckle noise, low signal-to-noise ratio, and complex backscatter characteristics. Although recent studies increasingly adopt transformer-based backbones, their effectiveness for SAR imagery remains insufficiently understood. This study presents a systematic evaluation of backbone–attention interactions across four segmentation architectures (BiSeNetV1, DeepLabv3+, UNet, and UNetFormer) using two datasets with distinct characteristics: Gaofen-3 PolSAR and Sentinel-1. The results show that the effectiveness of the backbone is strongly influenced by data characteristics. On the more complex Gaofen-3 dataset, cardinality-driven convolutional backbone ResNext consistently achieves the highest segmentation accuracy. In contrast, on the simpler Sentinel-1 dataset, performance differences across evaluated backbones become much smaller, and EfficientNet-V2-S provides the best accuracy–efficiency trade-off. Transformer-based backbones consistently underperform in both datasets, suggesting limited compatibility with the evaluated SAR data characteristics. Among the attention mechanisms, SE-Block consistently provides the largest and most stable performance gains, while CBAM offers additional improvements primarily in more complex scenes. Transformer-style window attention yields limited or negative benefits. These findings challenge the widespread preference for transformer-based designs and indicate that aligning architectural inductive biases with SAR data characteristics is critical for developing accurate, efficient, and scalable SAR semantic segmentation models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wijaya et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: