This paper examines Taiwan’s Cultural Technology Content Ecosystem (CTCE) policies through the Augmented Heritage Gateway (AHG) project in Tainan, revealing how policies privilege infrastructure and technology while relying on under-supported intermediary labour. These actors perform three essential functions—semantic mediation, infrastructural translation, and political negotiation—requiring fusion skills that integrate creative, technical, and relational competencies. Drawing on a multiphase qualitative study with stakeholders and experts, the paper advances an analysis centred on cultural intermediation under state-led governance, conceptualizing platformization as a governance modality and industrial policy as a structural condition shaping intermediary labour. Findings show the absence of intermediary roles in training and policy support, reflecting Taiwan’s technology-first and risk-averse governance culture. The study foregrounds the invisibility and precarity of intermediary labour and reframes intermediation as a site of responsibility shifting within cultural–technological ecosystems, showing how fusion skills absorb institutional risk under state-led governance and highlighting policy implications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hsiao-Ling Chung (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: