Document Reference: ARC-ANL-INJ-002Companion Specification: ARC-SPEC-AGENT-HCE-001 (10.5281/zenodo.23076445)Governing Framework: Invariant Taxonomy (Physical, Digital, Legacy)Primary Invariant Proved: Theorem 1 (State Conservation Under DENY: D(a) = DENY ⇒ Δ_external = 0)Target Master Anchor: A-77-DELTA-SHIELD-LOCKED (10.5281/zenodo.22665852) This paper presents a formal failure-mode trace and mathematical proof demonstrating that runtime prompt injection attacks against non-deterministic AI producers yield non-zero state mutation (Δ_external ≠ 0) under Legacy Invariants with probability P → 1 as attempts increase, but guarantee zero external state mutation (Δ_external = 0) under Digital Invariants for every DENY verdict, regardless of model context, hallucination, or injection depth. Key Contributions:- Legacy Failure-Mode Trace: Demonstrates that intent classifiers with positive false-negative rates (p > 0) decay asymptotically under repeated injection variants (P_bypass = 1 - (1-p)^N → 1).- Digital Invariant Trace: Traces four malicious injection actions (overpressure, alarm suppression, socket exfiltration, bpf map tampering) through Rust gate envelope predicates and eBPF LSM hooks.- Formal Proof of State Conservation: Establishes Lemma 1 (Egress Isolation), Lemma 2 (Non-Interference), Lemma 3 (Single-Use Tokens), and Theorem 1 (State Conservation Under DENY).- Constant Residual Risk Corollary: Proves that residual bypass probability under Digital Invariants equals TCB failure probability and is strictly constant in adversary attempts N.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jesse Ward Tuohy (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: